Appreciated and I totally agree with you John,
My point was just that we tend to enthusiastically get into these typs of discussions on the board because you, and I, and everyone else here have been talking about lights for a really long time, and it's nice to have some good old discussion about a slightly different type of topic. Plus, we feel a moral obligation to not police our board because we understand the potential negative consequences associated with emergency lighting.
For the OP however, he's brand new here and doesn't have the luxury of knowing all there is to know about lights like we do, and merely came here for a simple and direct answer to a question about his cruiser.
I just sensed some frustration in the OPs reply because it seemed like no one had actually taken the time to simply explain what the process would be for him, or his up fitter, to change things... instead we each took turns telling the OP why his idea was a bad one, and why he should do what *we* tell him.
Don't get me wrong, the warnings about going against department directive are certainly valuable, but I think that we should also be careful not to decide who is worthy of an answer and who isn't. (If the OP were a fleet guy trying to change/fix something he or she was handed from another department, I'm sure the answers would have been more immediately clear and forthcoming.)
Really, I was just trying to answer the OPs question in a manner he could understand, all while poking some fun at our propensity on the board to debate the merits of emergency lighting instead of the practical applications of them.
I know I have been guilty of it myself on more than one occasion.
