Results 1 to 8 of 8
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Hoser

Thread: Rescue Responding to a MVA

  1. #1
    Author of This Thread
    Member
    Volunteer Fire Fighter
    Law Enforcement
    Transportation

    firedude is offline
    Joined April 2011
    NY
    394 Posts

    Rescue Responding to a MVA

    There are 2 resons I am posting this... 1) It's an awesome truck with poor lighing. 2) It's for sale!! If your Interested in more info, go to the Department's webpage... Greenfield Fire District. The truck is a 2000 Central States medium-rescue truck and is located in upstate NY. I filmed it today responding to a MVA. The Company is recieving a 2012 KME Rescue Pumper in April to replace it. Watch in HD!!!

    My personal opinion does not reflect the opinion of others or my department.

    Check out my photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/42030424@N08/

    Check out my videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/kylewagman?feature=mhee

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Hobbyist

    Wailer is offline
    Joined May 2010
    Canada
    730 Posts
    The siren sounds like a Code 3 V-CON or Mastercom.
    The siren fanatic.

  3. #3
    Member
    Law Enforcement

    upnorth896 is offline
    Joined December 2011
    MI
    80 Posts
    Agree - Lighting is weak.

  4. #4
    Veteran

    FireEMSPolice is offline
    Joined May 2010
    (area of) Columbus, Ohio
    2,142 Posts
    Yea, weak lighting set up. It has lots of potential though!

  5. #5
    Veteran
    Fire/Paramedic
    Vintage Collector
    Security

    Hoser is online now
    Joined June 2010
    Ohio
    1,789 Posts
    Not a bad looking truck, as far as lighting goes looks like the rear is the weakest part.

  6. #6
    Veteran

    stansdds is offline
    Joined May 2010
    U.S.A., Virginia
    1,112 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Hoser View Post
    Not a bad looking truck, as far as lighting goes looks like the rear is the weakest part.
    My thoughts exactly. The rear needs help. The lightbar is a Code2 XL5000 all light. These were good bars, but I think the sealed beam versions were better. The single halogen rotators spin so fast to get a good number of flashes per minute, but the flash duration (dwell time) is too short. The slower turning, dual sealed beam rotators used a lot more amperage, but each flash had enough dwell time to really pop and attract the eye. The independent rotators create more of a blur motion.
    Just because you can do something doesn't necessarily mean that you should do it.

  7. #7
    Veteran

    nerdly_dood is offline
    Joined June 2010
    Virginia
    1,371 Posts
    The lighting's fine, it's got side-facing bumper strobes, a lower halogen flasher about midway down the length, side-facing strobes at the back end, and two low-level rear-facing strobes below the taillights that the camera didn't catch - you can see a flash or two at the very end of the video. The only thing I'd do differently is use colored domes on the lightbar.

  8. #8
    Member
    Law Enforcement
    Volunteer Fire Fighter

    5309 is offline
    Joined January 2012
    Central, Florida
    407 Posts
    not bad looking


 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBulletin™ ©2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. | Style by CompletevB | SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc. | Showcases by DTO | PhotoPost Classifieds
eLightbars.org ©1997 - 2012 All Rights Reserved. All trademarks referenced herein are property of their respective owners.