wdfd24 said:That really tall single stack on the international looks horrible.
firefighter7017 said:Agreed. I see no practical reason for it to be that high.
CPDG23 said:I am by no means a ARFF guy but I would imagine they were responding to a report of a fire on airport property. No way in hell the FAA would allow ARFF to respond to a city call and leave the airport still in operation.
Any ARFF guys here to confirm my suspicions?
CPDG23 said:I am by no means a ARFF guy but I would imagine they were responding to a report of a fire on airport property. No way in hell the FAA would allow ARFF to respond to a city call and leave the airport still in operation.
Any ARFF guys here to confirm my suspicions?
twodogs603 said:I guess every airport is different but I'm sure they do follow some form of governmental regulations and rules. I know at our airport, the airport fire dept responds in a small response truck to calls at the terminals, but the city fire dep't responds in for alarms/fires/medical calls to the airport structures. The ARFF trucks keep their responsibility to the airfield.
lafd55 said:Our local airport has a Structural Engine and a Mini-Pumper that is used for response off the flight line. You will never see an ARFF rig outside the fence unless it's requested by a surrounding agency for foam, which is VERY rare.
[Broken External Image]:http://i619.photobucket.com/albums/tt272/lafd55/DSC_9545copy_zps2a7e7ce2.jpg
[Broken External Image]:http://i619.photobucket.com/albums/tt272/lafd55/DSC_9563copy_zps48086539.jpg
10-75.Net - Fire Service Photography by Eli Gill
I think you may be mixing up incidents.... I don't believe any ARFF vehicles were at that fire, plus Columbia County is tooooo far off the reservation for them.proudfirefighter said:Did they send a crash truck to the TCI fire in Columbia County last year? I didn't think they did, maybe it was the Air Force base.
Could be mixing up incidents though.