17/184 combo

May 21, 2010
422
Western Montana
Was this an actual production combo from FS (hellooooooo Eric!)?? If so, wonder why the N.Y.P.D. wouldn't have adopted it instead of the 175H/66 Pulsator (assuming it was moded for as a 175H).

I always think I've seen it all, but every couple of years some unique combination/home brew comes along to amaze me!

 

NESQ115

Member
Jan 21, 2012
118
New York
Was this an actual production combo from FS (hellooooooo Eric!)?? If so, wonder why the N.Y.P.D. wouldn't have adopted it instead of the 175H/66 Pulsator (assuming it was moded for as a 175H).

I always think I've seen it all, but every couple of years some unique combination/home brew comes along to amaze me!


Wow. Never saw that before. I have no idea if this was an actual production item; never saw it in a catalog. Interesting idea but even if it ever was a production item, the question re NYPD is, was this a production item back in 1963/64? The path was set back in '63 when NYPD went to the 175H/66 combination for its highway patrol cars, and then adopted it for the rest of the fleet in '64. Note also that that combination was an incremental change from what NYPD had just started using in '63; a clear-domed Beacon Ray and and underhood Pulsator. I am not aware of any indication that NYPD was at all interested in having an electronic siren at that point; they just wanted to improve upon the mechanical siren. Otherwise they could have used the Dietz speaker-light. Now imagine what it would have looked like if FS had somehow created a stacked 175-over-66 unit!
 

Attachments

  • 30688465_20653952470669 - Copy.jpg
    30688465_20653952470669 - Copy.jpg
    184.3 KB · Views: 38
May 21, 2010
422
Western Montana
Thanks to all for filling in the blanks. Hmmm, I wonder if they ever thought about installing a Visibeam on a Twinsonic--will start tinkering with that tonight....

Wonder what the next surprise will be!:D
 
  • Like
Reactions: southpaw

cmb56

Member
May 22, 2010
746
Norrköping, Sweden
Personally I think that this speaker base was more intended for the model 14 than the model 17.

Regarding NYPD to what I know they had a 5” model 175 but with the same lamp angles as the later 175-H and with a model 28 siren underhood in 1963 not a Pulsator version.

When they moved the siren from underhood up to the roof they changed it to the new Pulsator version (P660) in the 66-series and needed to rise it abow the siren and added the 7 1/2” base to the 175 which become the 175-H.

The switch to electronic siren was in 1973 when NYC ”forbid” electro-mechanical sirens because sound pollution.

A good electro-mechanical siren will always over sound an electronic siren.
 
Jun 18, 2013
3,717
PA
So why does the tag read 17 if the insides are obviously not a model 17?
 
  • Like
Reactions: southpaw

Lt.214

Lifetime VIP Donor
May 21, 2010
596
Southwest Ohio USA
So why does the tag read 17 if the insides are obviously not a model 17?
Expand the picture, it is a 176, the "6" is hard to see due to it being stamped and not colored screened like the 17 is , which was typical of the time. Federal mass produced the badges and left the final model digit to be hand stamped. The same process was done for the serial numbers, hence only the "2R" is in red.
 
Jun 18, 2013
3,717
PA
Expand the picture, it is a 176, the "6" is hard to see due to it being stamped and not colored screened like the 17 is , which was typical of the time. Federal mass produced the badges and left the final model digit to be hand stamped. The same process was done for the serial numbers, hence only the "2R" is in red.


WoW that 6 is straight up ninja..
 
  • Like
Reactions: southpaw

southpaw

Member
May 7, 2015
723
South-West
Personally I think that this speaker base was more intended for the model 14 than the model 17.

Regarding NYPD to what I know they had a 5” model 175 but with the same lamp angles as the later 175-H and with a model 28 siren underhood in 1963 not a Pulsator version.

When they moved the siren from underhood up to the roof they changed it to the new Pulsator version (P660) in the 66-series and needed to rise it abow the siren and added the 7 1/2” base to the 175 which become the 175-H.

The switch to electronic siren was in 1973 when NYC ”forbid” electro-mechanical sirens because sound pollution.

A good electro-mechanical siren will always over sound an electronic siren.
I think the CJL base was more Model 17 oriented, based on photos and use. Also it follows what NYPD with the high skirt and model 175.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tony P and dmathieu

southpaw

Member
May 7, 2015
723
South-West

Attachments

  • 5862d0df5b10eded1402d3a9119874d0.jpg
    5862d0df5b10eded1402d3a9119874d0.jpg
    24.2 KB · Views: 23
  • 87227fa991e6b61cf6c97b35197ecce6.jpg
    87227fa991e6b61cf6c97b35197ecce6.jpg
    29.6 KB · Views: 28
  • 177439-64a24a9fd56a7cba974189741c975cf2.jpg
    177439-64a24a9fd56a7cba974189741c975cf2.jpg
    10.9 KB · Views: 29

cmb56

Member
May 22, 2010
746
Norrköping, Sweden
I think the CJL base was more Model 17 oriented, based on photos and use. Also it follows what NYPD with the high skirt and model 175.
Yes, you are probably right.

Personally I find the looks of this speaker base together with a 17 looking quiet ridiculous.

Comparing it with the Dietz counterpart that was made for the 240/7-40 the Federal Signal CJL would in my opinion look much better with a 14 or with a cut down 17-series light.

Maybe it was intended to use cut down 17-series lights.

Reading the text in the catalogue page you showed also state Beacon Ray which I had forgot when I wrote my comment.

I still think it look ridiculous.

Michael
 

stansdds

Member
May 25, 2010
3,538
U.S.A., Virginia
Yep, interesting piece of Federal Signal history, but not for $1000. Just too steep for me to even consider buying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tsquale

tsquale

Lifetime VIP Donor
Oct 12, 2010
10,537
Minnesota, USA
Yep, interesting piece of Federal Signal history, but not for $1000. Just too steep for me to even consider buying.
Agreed 1000%. I made a fair and reasonable offer shortly after it was listed and he replied back that he had tons of people messaging and making him offers so he wouldn't take less than $1000. Nice to see it still hasn't sold. He should have taken my money :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: southpaw

Wailer

Member
May 24, 2010
2,293
Canada
The switch to electronic siren was in 1973 when NYC ”forbid” electro-mechanical sirens because sound pollution.

But the first electronic siren (Stat VI) NYPD used had an awesome sounding yelp.

A good electro-mechanical siren will always over sound an electronic siren.
The only ones I like are the B&M S8 and Sterling model 30. Federal 66s and Qs sound too shrill and tinny.
 
  • Like
Reactions: southpaw

Forum Statistics

Threads
54,104
Messages
450,313
Members
19,160
Latest member
jaf10596

About Us

  • Since 1997, eLightbars has been the premier venue for all things emergency warning equipment. Discussions, classified listings, pictures, videos, chat, & more! Our staff members strive to keep the forums organized and clutter-free. All of our offerings are free-of-charge with all costs offset by banner advertising. Premium offerings are available to improve your experience.

User Menu

Secure Browsing & Transactions

eLightbars.org uses SSL to secure all traffic between our server and your browsing device. All browsing and transactions within are secured by an SSL Certificate with high-strength encryption.