Zapp Brannigan
Lifetime VIP Donor
Flashguy said:11 FOOT 8 ? The Canopener Bridge
Apparently this happens enough that a guy records the bridge 24/7 and posts videos of it. LoL
RyanZ71 said:I'm guilty of having tried to fit a freightliner box truck under a bridge like that I normally drove a smaller truck but that day had to take the big one as mine was in the shop getting it's 3rd automatic transmission in under 100,000 miles (97 Ford Power Stroke) the smaller truck always fits fine under the bridge but duh... not a 12 foot tall freightliner. that was fun. And I did get a well deserved ticket for it as well.
FireEMSPolice said:So you purposely take a 12' tall truck in a spot that you know to have a lower clearance?
We have that happen around here regularly. When it does, it chokes off access to the hospital and this side of town. The fine is stiff too. $1500 if you hit it, $900 if you get to the bridge and need help getting turned around. There are many many signs warning of the bridge and clearance for miles ahead, some have flashing lights and tell you to turn off. Yet, retards seem to test it any way.
Clearly the firefighter operating that ladder truck should never drive it again if he cant read the signs. That ladder is really FUBAR'd. That turntable is bent up.
RyanZ71 said:Purposely wanted to crash the truck? no. It was one of those situations where I was so use to driving that way in the smaller truck that I didn't even think about the height issue. And that has been the same excuse many others have used as the bridge I hit has been and continues to be run into by trucks of all sizes.
dustymedic said:That truck just went in service a few months ago. It was at Fire Rescue International in August.
twodogs603 said:I think there is some major damage there. Look at the turn table.
SeattleSAR said:Dear Chief,
As you may already be aware of, our aerial failed my latest battery of durability testing. On a positive note, it is better that it failed this test, rather than failing with personnel on it in a situation that would lead to serious injury or perhaps even the death of one of our fellow fire fighters. (I will make it a point to meet with you later so you can thank me for preventing this potential tragedy.) In light of the fact that our aerial is now out of service, I submit the following replacement with some of it's safety features highlighted:
View attachment 65307
Although, the best feature is that with it's low clearance, light weight and portability, this incident will not be able to be repeated by another fire fighter, as I will not have the opportunity to try again, having been released from the department and am now fleeing the country to avoid your wrath and the almost certain ass kicking that you have in mind for me for wrecking your expensive truck.
Sincerely,
FF Jack Knob (Forcibly Ret.)
Image courtesy of laddersafety.org
SeattleSAR said:Dear Chief,
As you may already be aware of, our aerial failed my latest battery of durability testing. On a positive note, it is better that it failed this test, rather than failing with personnel on it in a situation that would lead to serious injury or perhaps even the death of one of our fellow fire fighters. (I will make it a point to meet with you later so you can thank me for preventing this potential tragedy.) In light of the fact that our aerial is now out of service, I submit the following replacement with some of it's safety features highlighted:
View attachment 65307
Although, the best feature is that with it's low clearance, light weight and portability, this incident will not be able to be repeated by another fire fighter, as I will not have the opportunity to try again, having been released from the department and am now fleeing the country to avoid your wrath and the almost certain ass kicking that you have in mind for me for wrecking your expensive truck.
Sincerely,
FF Jack Knob (Forcibly Ret.)
Image courtesy of laddersafety.org
SeattleSAR said:Holy thread revival, Batman!!
vonirkinshtine said:
tvsjr said:I really love everyone commenting about "fire truck fail"... tell us, have you ever driven a piece of fire apparatus, especially responding to calls code 3? Your mind is going through a million different checklists. Sometimes, even the best of drivers screws up... I've certainly had my moments in 6 years and more than a thousand code 3 responses. You get the shit fixed and you move on.
tvsjr said:I really love everyone commenting about "fire truck fail"... tell us, have you ever driven a piece of fire apparatus, especially responding to calls code 3? Your mind is going through a million different checklists. Sometimes, even the best of drivers screws up... I've certainly had my moments in 6 years and more than a thousand code 3 responses. You get the shit fixed and you move on.
Zapp Brannigan said:Methinks you need to relax, and don't take it personally. I am sure the vast majority of members here have driven Code 3 at one point or another, and some of them in apparatus as large, if not larger than the one pictured.
Go take a nice cool refreshing drink, and resume normal operations.