sbparkcop said:
I respectfully disagree.
If the intersection is clear, the ambulance has no need to pause and can proceed forward without interruption. In a city like mine, where every intersection has a traffic signal, this can mean minutes off of the drive time en route to the hospital (if coming from certain parts of town). If those minutes can mean the life or death of a child or one of my brothers/sisters in law enforcement or the fire service, then I'm going to do what I can to help.
First of all,
THE INTERSECTION IS NOT CLEAR!!! Blocking the intersection doesn't secure it. You still have to stop. So there goes the time you think you are saving. It doesn't matter who is sitting in the intersection, you still have to treat it as a red light and fully stop. Blowing an intersection is blowing an intersection. So right there, the whole argument that it saves time is debunked.
Unless you blow the intersection, breaking the law and violating all established guidelines and SOGs I have ever read, you will save absolutely no time.
Second
, even if you violate established guidelines and blow these intersections,
it doesn't actually take minutes off the drive. It seems like you are saving all sorts of time, but you aren't. Not slowing down or making a complete stop saves 3-5 seconds per instance. Times 10 traffic lights that's 30-50 seconds. In order to shave "minutes" off you would need to blow through 40 traffic lights.
Keep in mind that any time savings here is at the expense of breaking the law, and directly disobeying every SOG/SOP I could find in print.
You say it means the difference of a life or death, well it does....but in the opposite way you meant. Driving dangerously increases the chance that you or someone else will be killed.
A 2003 study in St. Petersburg FL found the average time saved by transporting or responding emergent was 33 seconds. A similar study in Syracuse found the average time saved was 43 sec. These are urban areas, not country roads.
I can't believe you guys are actually advocating doing this. Any EVOC class will tell you that you should
never pass another emergency vehicle, only
use escorts at low speed for official motorcade type duties,
don't directly follow other emergency vehicles and
stop at all red light intersections regardless of whether another vehicle is there. 4 major points of safe emergency driving (not to mention laws) violated in one action.... yet you guys are claiming this is acceptable and actually believe it saves a significant amount of time.
Riding on the tailboards of the apparatus saves 3 seconds of climbing out of the seat and opening the door. Not wearing a seat belt saves 2 seconds getting out of the truck. Running in w/o a scene size up can save 15 seconds. Not chocking the wheels before pumping can save 5 seconds. Driving out before the garage door is all the way up can save 2 seconds. Looky there, we just saved 27 seconds! And that makes a huge difference right? Are these dangers worth it? It's the same thing you guys are advocating, nominal time savings in exchange for a huge risk.
It's 2011, time to get your heads out of your asses people. Driving like this doesn't save any significant amount of time and increases the chances you or others will be killed and doesn't help in any way. You are public safety professionals, on duty to protect people, not endanger yourself and others.