RL1 said:
It is more the actual Officer's who drive them, admins do not care.
From Chicago PD beat coppers, the foot well is uncomfortable, the driver has a hard time getting a decent position for their left foot to rest. Entry and exit difficult. Passenger seat space is more uncomfortable and cramped.
From a Canadian agency, "The Explorer was given to the supervisors and has not held up, even though the same 4 Sgts drive it. The door arm rest has collapsed the heater controls stopped working and the car was down for 2 months waiting for parts. We have had Ford installed emergency light in the front turn signals fail on 2 separate occasions which has been expensive and we have had to wait weeks for the parts. I find the Explorer cramped and all the controls very cheap. I hate the thing."
Dallas County Sheriffs Deputy told me that while he hated the
CVPI, he asked to be assigned another one after spending a month in a Explorer. He is a big guy, and getting in and out of the thing was always a problem. Less than 1000 miles on it, and the interior was falling apart. Hesitation on launch after idling for more than 20 minutes doing radar. The only thing he liked was the brakes, but said another Deputy had his brakes get hot soaked, and the rotors started warping after a long code 3 run, again less than 1000 miles.
Ft. Worth traffic cops did not care for it, and found the Taurus more comfortable, and better suited for their use.
But this is the case with any vehicle, LEO's are going to find something to complain about With the exception of allowing an Officer to buy his own
PPV of choice, or extensive real world testing from all
PPV's offered, the LEO's are going to have to drive whatever the admins decide to purchase. It used to be, for some of the big agencies, a variety of
PPV's would be bought every year. This was when everything was RWD and V8, and there were Ford LTD/Crown Vics, Chevy Impala/Caprice, and Dodge Diplomat/Plymouth Grand Fury.